Blog

News, analysis, comment and updates from ICLR's case law and UK legislation platform

Case Law On Trial – the results: 1971-1995
Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 25 September 2015

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 25 September 2015

This week’s roundup of legal news and events includes Lord Sumption’s assumption, Jeremy Corbyn’s legal team, Gove’s policy revisions, and two Transparency Project investigations. Plus human rights in foreign parts and a porcine speculation.   Judicial diversity Lord Sumption makes an assumption In modern Britain, the fastest way to make enemies is to deliver a Continue reading about Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 25 September 2015

Case Law On Trial – the results: 1946-1970
Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 18 September 2015
Case Law On Trial – the results: 1915-1945
Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 11 September 2015
Human Rights: can we go it alone?
Case Law On Trial – the results: 1865 – 1914
Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 4 September 2015

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 4 September 2015

We resume our weekly survey of legal news and events with a catchup of what’s been happening over the vacation, both at home and abroad. Red Queen redux What does acquitted phonehacking defendant Rebekah Brooks’ reinstallation as chief executive at News Corp UK say about money, Murdoch and management? Reading Beyond Contempt, Peter Jukes’ eyewitness Continue reading about Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 4 September 2015

“To be heard in the dining hall…”:   Scott 100 years on

“To be heard in the dining hall…”: Scott 100 years on

The open justice principle identified in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 remains the default position for family proceedings. Any derogation or departure must be justified as an exception. The approach of the Family Procedure Rules (in FPR r 27.10), purporting to reverse the polarity of that presumption of open justice, ought to be regarded as ultra vires (ie not within the statutory powers of the rule makers: see Courts Act 2003 ss 75 and 76) — not to mention an affront to the whole purpose of open justice and transparency, viz accountability and the disinfecting powers of sunlight, argues David Burrows in this guest post. Continue reading about “To be heard in the dining hall…”: Scott 100 years on