Blog

News, analysis, comment and updates from ICLR's case law and UK legislation platform

We walked the walk! Please help support legal advice in 2016

The ICLR team walked the London Legal Walk. Our team of law reporters and editors included Celia Fox, Isobel Collins, Scott McGlinchey, Georgina Orde, Susanne Rook and Tom Barnes. Here are some photographs taken along the way.       We were walking with the Lord Chief Justice and thousands of lawyers to raise funds for the London Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 13 May 2016

This week’s scenic tour of legal news and comment includes human rights legislation, the employment law of footwear, protection of intellectual property and a plea for students to slough off their intellectual bubblewrap. Human Rights HL report coldwaters Bill of Rights proposal Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998 would, said the House of Lords EU Continue reading

ICLR at CALL 2016 – Competences, Challenges, Connections

COMPETENCIES, CHALLENGES, CONNECTIONS is the theme for the Canadian Association of Law Libraries/L’Association canadienne des bibliothèques de droit annual Conference 2016, which is being held at Vancouver, British Columbia. The Canadian Association of Law Libraries (CALL) is dedicated to promoting the networking, professional development and career growth of all law librarians in Canada, no matter Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 6 May 2016

This week’s roundup of legal news and commentary includes press freedom (or lack of it), probation services, undercover anonymity, copyright infringement, and pupillage. Enjoy! Human Rights World Press Freedom Day On 3 May each year we celebrate World Press Freedom Day, which was first proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in 1993, following a recommendation Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 29 April 2016

This week’s dance round the legal maypole includes news and commentary about the historic fresh inquest verdicts from Hillsborough, a Home Secretarial salvo against Strasbourg, three tiers of judicial recruitment, and problems with fair trials.   Inquests Hillsborough verdicts A second set of inquests into the deaths of 96 football fans killed at the Hillsborough Continue reading

Bundles of joy – CPR Practice Direction 52C, para 33

Law reporters have always depended on the goodwill of advocates and instructing solicitors in providing copies of pleadings, skeleton arguments and authorities bundles to help in the process of reporting important precedents. In the past, such help was sought and given unofficially. Although there has been a series of practice directions on how court bundles Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 22 April 2016

This week’s collection of legal news and comment includes another court fees hike, the fate of the privacy injunction, a ban on making art in an art gallery, the mingling of caffeine and the printed word, and some other rather asinine stuff to divert you from your timesheets and deadlines. Privacy “The Law is an Ass”: Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 15 April 2016

This week’s selection of legal news and events includes fact-checking the EU before the referendum, a new European data protection regime, a copyright claim that’s music to the lawyer’s ears, and the poison of a “millstone” name. European Union Facts amid the fog of lies, damned lies and bogus statistics Thanks to a generous public, Continue reading

Panama papers: take legal professional privilege and a little iniquity…

Guest post by David Burrows   Confidentiality, privilege and the Panama papers The leak of information from a firm of Panama lawyers – the Panama papers – raises a variety of questions for English lawyers, notably in the areas of confidentiality and of legal professional privilege (LPP). Papers held by a lawyer are confidential – Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 8 April 2016

This week’s roundup of legal news and comment includes an embarrassing Panamanian data leak, guidance on intellectual property, some views on judicial diversity and a collection of good and bad developments overseas. And after last week’s folly, it’s all perfectly serious. Panama: a question of trust(s) Here’s how it began (according to Süddeutsche Zeitung):  Over Continue reading