Blog

News, analysis, comment and updates from ICLR's case law and UK legislation platform

Case Law On Trial – the results: 1971-1995

To commemorate the fact that ICLR has been creating case history for the last 150 years, we’re putting together a special Anniversary Edition of the Law Reports, which will include the 15 top cases voted for by you, our readers. We divided our history into five periods, and allowed a month for you to vote for a case from each period. Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 25 September 2015

This week’s roundup of legal news and events includes Lord Sumption’s assumption, Jeremy Corbyn’s legal team, Gove’s policy revisions, and two Transparency Project investigations. Plus human rights in foreign parts and a porcine speculation.   Judicial diversity Lord Sumption makes an assumption In modern Britain, the fastest way to make enemies is to deliver a Continue reading

Case Law On Trial – the results: 1946-1970

To commemorate the fact that ICLR has been creating case history for the last 150 years, we’re putting together a special Anniversary Edition of the Law Reports, which will include the 15 top cases voted for by you, our readers. We divided our history into five periods, and allowed a month for you to vote for a case from each period. Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 18 September 2015

The latest buffet of legal news and events includes confusion over sex cases, the heroic resistance of art to official state stupidity, and links to some interesting reading and lectures. And over the next week Team ICLR is in Berlin, to record its impressions of international librarianship.   Ai Weiwei at the RA Prisoner of conscience makes art Continue reading

Case Law On Trial – the results: 1915-1945

To commemorate the fact that ICLR has been creating case history for the last 150 years, we’re putting together a special Anniversary Edition of the Law Reports, which will include the 15 top cases voted for by you, our readers. We divided our history into five periods, and allowed a month for you to vote for a case from each period. Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 11 September 2015

This week’s collection of legal news and related matters includes the legality of drone strikes, the fate of Just Solutions, the future of human rights legislation and the decline and fall of English literature’s most controversial novel.   Legality of drone strikes Is there a Kill List? The announcement by David Cameron in the House Continue reading

Human Rights: can we go it alone?

“Take it from me – the Human Rights Act is toast.” Martin Howe QC. Last night the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI) held a debate, hosted at Gray’s Inn, on the subject: Human Rights: can we go it alone? The speakers were: Sir Keir Starmer QC MP, a human rights barrister and former Director Continue reading

Case Law On Trial – the results: 1865 – 1914

To commemorate the fact that ICLR has been creating case history for the last 150 years, we’re putting together a special Anniversary Edition of the Law Reports, which will include the 15 top cases voted for by you, our readers. We divided our history into five periods, and allowed a month for you to vote for a case from each period. Continue reading

Weekly Notes: legal news from ICLR – 4 September 2015

We resume our weekly survey of legal news and events with a catchup of what’s been happening over the vacation, both at home and abroad. Red Queen redux What does acquitted phonehacking defendant Rebekah Brooks’ reinstallation as chief executive at News Corp UK say about money, Murdoch and management? Reading Beyond Contempt, Peter Jukes’ eyewitness Continue reading

“To be heard in the dining hall…”: Scott 100 years on

The open justice principle identified in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 remains the default position for family proceedings. Any derogation or departure must be justified as an exception. The approach of the Family Procedure Rules (in FPR r 27.10), purporting to reverse the polarity of that presumption of open justice, ought to be regarded as ultra vires (ie not within the statutory powers of the rule makers: see Courts Act 2003 ss 75 and 76) — not to mention an affront to the whole purpose of open justice and transparency, viz accountability and the disinfecting powers of sunlight, argues David Burrows in this guest post. Continue reading