Hearings
England & Wales
08 Mar 1982 [1982] 1 WLR 614; [1982] 2 All ER 536; 75 Cr App R 322, CA
(pet all) [1982] 1 WLR 624, HL(E)
01 Jul 1982 [1982] AC 822; [1982] 3 WLR 192; [1982] 2 All ER 731; 75 Cr App R 322, HL(E)
R v Rose (Newton)
Additional names
Subject Matter
CRIME — Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) — New trial — Conviction quashed on ground of material irregularity while jury in retirement — Whether power to order venire de novo — Criminal Appeal Act 1966, s 1(2)(b)(ii) (as amended by Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s 52(1), Sch 5)
[1982] 1 WLR 614; [1982] 2 All ER 536; 75 Cr App R 322, CA
[1982] AC 822; [1982] 3 WLR 192; [1982] 2 All ER 731; 75 Cr App R 322, HL(E)
CRIME — Jury — Retirement to consider verdict — Judge's private communication to jury in retirement limiting time for verdict — Whether material irregularity in course of trial — Whether discretion in Court of Appeal to order venire de novo
[1982] 1 WLR 614; [1982] 2 All ER 536; 75 Cr App R 322, CA
[1982] AC 822; [1982] 3 WLR 192; [1982] 2 All ER 731; 75 Cr App R 322, HL(E)
Appellate History
R v Rose (Newton) [1982] 1 WLR 614; [1982] 2 All ER 536; 75 Cr App R 322, CA
Decision of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) affirmed
R v Rose (Newton) [1982] AC 822; [1982] 3 WLR 192; [1982] 2 All ER 731; 75 Cr App R 322, HL(E)
Commentary
Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Bases of Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) - Venire de Novo
D26.2
Retirement of Jury - Custody of the Jury Bailiff - Communication with the Jury D19.6
Retirement of Jury - Questions from the Jury - Notes Relating to the Trial D19.20
Majority Verdicts - Time Requirement - Application of the Time Requirement D19.37
Returning the Verdict - Jury Must Not Be Pressurised - Proper Discussion of Timing with the Jury D19.85