[HOUSE OF LORDS]
REGINA APPELLANT AND ROSE RESPONDENT REGINA APPELLANT AND JOHNSON RESPONDENT REGINA APPELLANT AND CLARKE RESPONDENT REGINA APPELLANT AND HENRY RESPONDENT (CONSOLIDATED APPEALS)
[On appeal from REGINA v. ROSE (NEWTON)]
1982 June 14;
July 1
Lord Diplock, Lord Scarman, Lord Roskill, Lord Bridge of Harwich and Lord Brandon of Oakbrook
CrimeCourt of AppealNew trialConviction quashed on ground of material irregularity while jury in retirementWhether power to order venire de novo Criminal Appeal Act 1966 (c. 31), s. 1 (2) (b) (ii) (as amended by Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19), s. 52 (1), Sch. 5) [1]

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies