The Weekly Law Reports
[1982] 3 WLR 192
[HOUSE OF LORDS]
REGINA APPELLANT AND ROSE RESPONDENT REGINA APPELLANT AND JOHNSON RESPONDENT REGINA APPELLANT AND CLARKE RESPONDENT REGINA APPELLANT AND HENRY RESPONDENT
(CONSOLIDATED APPEALS)
[On appeal from REGINA v. ROSE (NEWTON)]
1982 June 14;
July 1
July 1
Lord Diplock, Lord Scarman, Lord Roskill, Lord Bridge of Harwich and Lord Brandon of Oakbrook
Crime
— Court of Appeal
— New trial
— Conviction quashed on ground of material irregularity while jury in retirement
— Whether power to order venire de novo
—
Criminal Appeal Act 1966 (c. 31), s. 1 (2) (b) (ii) (as amended by Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19), s. 52 (1), Sch. 5)
[1]