26 Jan 2021 (Case C-16/19); EU:C:2021:64; [2021] ICR 898; [2021] WLR(D) 61, ECJ (President K Lenaerts, Vice-President R Silva de Lapuerta, Presidents of Chambers A Prechal, M Vilaras, E Regan, M Ilešič, Judges E Juhász, T von Danwitz, S Rodin, F Biltgen, K Jürimäe, C Lycourgos, N Jääskinen, Advocate General G Pitruzzella)
DISCRIMINATION — Disability — Disabled person — Disabled workers with disability certificates enjoying rights under Polish law — Employers required to pay contribution to national disability fund if employing less than certain percentage of disabled workers — Employer giving supplementary payment to workers producing disability certificate after certain date — Payment denied to employee who submitted certificate before that date — Whether different treatment of two groups of disabled workers on basis of apparently neutral criterion amounting to discrimination — Whether direct or indirect discrimination — Council Directive 2000/78/EC, art 2
(Case C-16/19); EU:C:2021:64; [2021] ICR 898; [2021] WLR(D) 61, ECJ
EU Enactments
Directive 2000/78/EC (Council), art 2
Cases considered in: VL v Szpital Kliniczny im dra J Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (Case C-16/19); EU:C:2021:64; [2021] ICR 898; [2021] WLR(D) 61, ECJ
Hay v Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres (Case C-267/12); EU:C:2013:823; [2014] 2 CMLR 32; [2013] CN 1904, ECJ Applied
Cases cited in: VL v Szpital Kliniczny im dra J Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (Case C-16/19); EU:C:2021:64; [2021] ICR 898; [2021] WLR(D) 61, ECJ
Achbita v G4S Secure Solutions NV (Case C-157/15); EU:C:2017:203; [2018] ICR 102; [2017] WLR (D) 175, ECJ
C (Judgment) (Case C-122/15); EU:C:2016:391, ECJ
CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria AD v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia (Nikolova , third parties) (Case C-83/14); EU:C:2015:480; [2015] All ER (EC) 1083; [2015] WLR (D) 314, ECJ (GC)
Coleman v Attridge Law (Case C-303/06); EU:C:2008:415; [2008] ICR 1128; [2008] All ER (EC) 1105, ECJ
Cresco Investigation GmbH v Achatzi (Case C-193/17); EU:C:2019:43, ECJ
Daouidi v Bootes Plus SL (Case C-395/15); EU:C:2016:917; [2017] ICR 420; [2016] WLR (D) 638, ECJ
Egenberger v Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung eV (Case C-414/16); EU:C:2018:257, ECJ
Hay v Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres (Case C-267/12); EU:C:2013:823; [2014] 2 CMLR 32; [2013] CN 1904, ECJ
Ingeniørforeningen i Danmark (acting on behalf of Andersen) v Region Syddanmark (Case C-499/08); EU:C:2010:600; [2012] All ER (EC) 342, ECJ
Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen (Case C-267/06); EU:C:2008:179; [2008] All ER (EC) 977; [2008] ECR I-1757, ECJ
Milkova v Izpalnitelen direktor na Agentsiata za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen control (Varhovna administrativna prokuratura intervening) (Case C-406/15); EU:C:2017:198; [2017] IRLR 566; [2017] WLR (D) 164, ECJ
NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI-Rete Lenford (Case C-507/18); EU:C:2020:289; [2020] ICR 1124; [2020] WLR(D) 238, ECJ (GC)
Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Christine Kleist. (Case C-356/09); EU:C:2010:703, ECJ
Ruiz Conejero v Ferroser Servicios Auxiliares SA (Case C-270/16); EU:C:2018:17; [2018] 2 CMLR 27, ECJ
Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (European Commission intervening) (Case C-147/08); EU:C:2011:286; [2011] ECR I-3591, ECJ
SEGRO Kft v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Sárvári Járási Földhivatala (Joined Cases C-52/16 and C-113/16); EU:C:2018:157, ECJ
Sindicatul Cadrelor Militare Disponibilizate în rezervă și în retragere (SCMD) v Ministerul Finanțelor Publice (Case C-262/14); EU:C:2015:336, ECJ
Cases subsequently considering: VL v Szpital Kliniczny im dra J Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (Case C-16/19); EU:C:2021:64; [2021] ICR 898; [2021] WLR(D) 61, ECJ
Considered in LF v SCRL (Case C-344/20); EU:C:2022:774; [2023] ICR 133; [2022] WLR(D) 399, ECJ
Cases citing: VL v Szpital Kliniczny im dra J Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie (Case C-16/19); EU:C:2021:64; [2021] ICR 898; [2021] WLR(D) 61, ECJ
EPI Environmental Technologies Inc (2) EPI Environmental Products Inc v (1) Symphony Plastic Technologies Plc (2) Symphony Environmental Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 3, CA
Första AP-Fonden v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV [2013] EWHC 3127 (Comm); [2013] CN 1690, QBD
IX v WABE eV (Joined Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19); EU:C:2021:594; [2022] ICR 190; [2021] WLR(D) 399; The Times, 26 August 2021, ECJ
LF v SCRL (Case C-344/20); EU:C:2022:774; [2023] ICR 133; [2022] WLR(D) 399, ECJ
Peterson v Google LLC (Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18); EU:C:2021:503; [2021] Bus LR 1196; [2021] WLR(D) 362, ECJ
Prokuratura Rejonowa Łódź-Bałuty v D. B. (Case C-150/21); EU:C:2022:268, ECJ
R v Richards (Louise James) [2003] EWCA Crim 980, CA
TC and UB v Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia and VA (Case C-824/19); EU:C:2021:862, ECJ
Vodafone Kabel Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. (Case C-484/20); EU:C:2021:975, ECJ
YT and Others v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca - MIUR and Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Campania (Case C-282/19); EU:C:2022:3, ECJ
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies