Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office

Subject Matter

HUMAN RIGHTS — Penalty — Confiscation order — Confiscation order imposed following conviction of drug trafficking offences with prison term in default of payment and restraint order over assets — Order made pursuant to new statutory provision not providing for discharge of confiscation order on service of default term — Statute in force at time of commission of offences discharging confiscation order in such circumstances — Whether effect of confiscation order and term in default to be considered together — Whether “penalty” — Whether enforcement of order following service of default term constituting heavier penalty than that applicable when offence committed — Whether breach of Convention rights — Whether court to exercise discretion against enforcement — Whether restraint order to be discharged as serving no purpose — Drug Trafficking Act 1994, s 9(5) — Human Rights Act 1998, s 6(2)(b), Sch 1, Pt I, art 7(1)

[2008] QB 476; [2008] 2 WLR 82

Appellate History

Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office [2006] EWHC 1212 (Admin), QBD

Decision of Collins J affirmed on different grounds

Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office [2007] EWCA Civ 686; [2008] QB 476; [2008] 2 WLR 82, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Enforcement, Reconsideration and Appeals - Enforcement - Default Term E19.74

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies