R v Z (Evidence: confession)

Additional names

R v Hasan

Subject Matter

CRIME — Duress — Voluntary association — Defendant associating with known criminal — Defendant committing aggravated burglary — Whether defence of duress available

[2005] 2 AC 467; [2003] 1 WLR 1489; [2005] 2 WLR 709

CRIME — Evidence — Confession — Admissibility — Off the record statement thought to be exculpatory when made — Inconsistencies between statement and defendant's case at trial — Prosecution seeking to cross-examine on contents of statement — Whether statement adverse to defendant — Whether “confession” — Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s 82(1)

[2005] 2 AC 467; [2003] 1 WLR 1489; [2005] 2 WLR 709

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Defences Involving Other Excuses and Justifications - Duress by Threats: Excluded Offences and Persons - Excluded Persons A3.45

Meaning of Confession: Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s. 82 - Partly and Wholly Exculpatory Statements F18.7

Determining the Admissibility of Confessions: The Voir Dire - Challenging Admissibility at Trial F18.67

Defences Involving Other Excuses and Justifications - Duress by Threats: General Principles A3.35

Defences Involving Other Excuses and Justifications - Duress by Threats: General Principles - Type of Threat Required A3.36

Defences Involving Other Excuses and Justifications - Duress by Threats: General Principles - Cogency of the Threat A3.37

Defences Involving Other Excuses and Justifications - Duress of Circumstances A3.52

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies