House of Lords
Regina v Z
[2005] UKHL 22
2005 Feb 9, 10;
March 17
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Baroness Hale of Richmond and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood
CrimeDuressVoluntary associationDefendant associating with known criminalDefendant committing aggravated burglaryWhether defence of duress available
CrimeEvidenceConfessionAdmissibilityOff the record statement thought to be exculpatory when madeInconsistencies between statement and defendant's case at trialProsecution seeking to cross-examine on contents of statementWhether statement adverse to defendantWhether “confession” Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c 60), s. 82(1)

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies