Hearings
England & Wales
18 Oct 1984 [1986] AC 717; [1985] 3 WLR 640; [1985] 3 All ER 795; [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1, CA
22 May 1986 [1986] AC 717; [1986] 2 WLR 1063; [1986] 2 All ER 385; [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109, HL(E)
18 Oct 1984 [1986] AC 717; [1985] 3 WLR 640; [1985] 3 All ER 795; [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1, CA
22 May 1986 [1986] AC 717; [1986] 2 WLR 1063; [1986] 2 All ER 385; [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109, HL(E)
AGENCY — Authority — Ostensible authority — Agent stating that he had his principal's authority to enter into specific agreement — Agent having no authority to agree terms — Whether principal bound by agreement
[1986] AC 717; [1985] 3 WLR 640; [1985] 3 All ER 795; [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1, CA
[1986] AC 717; [1986] 2 WLR 1063; [1986] 2 All ER 385; [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109, HL(E)
VICARIOUS LIABILITY — Master and servant — Deceit — Bribed employee representing that he had authority to enter into agreement on behalf of employer — Whether employer vicariously liable for deceit of employee — Whether bound by terms of contract
[1986] AC 717; [1985] 3 WLR 640; [1985] 3 All ER 795; [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1, CA
[1986] AC 717; [1986] 2 WLR 1063; [1986] 2 All ER 385; [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109, HL(E)
Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA (The Ocean Frost) [1986] AC 717; [1985] 3 WLR 640; [1985] 3 All ER 795; [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1, CA
Decision of the Court of Appeal affirmed
Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA (The Ocean Frost) [1986] AC 717; [1986] 2 WLR 1063; [1986] 2 All ER 385; [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109, HL(E)
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies