[COURT OF APPEAL]
ARMAGAS LTD. v. MUNDOGAS S.A.
[1982 A. No. 1967]
1984 June 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29;
July 3, 4, 5;
Oct. 18
Stephenson, Dunn and Robert Goff L.JJ.
AgencyAuthorityOstensible authorityAgent stating that he had his principal's authority to enter into specific agreementAgent having no authority to agree termsWhether principal bound by agreement
Vicarious LiabilityMaster and servantDeceitBribed employee representing that he had authority to enter into agreement on behalf of employerWhether employer vicariously liable for deceit of employeeWhether bound by terms of contract

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies