Attorney-General for Ceylon v Chettiar (No 1)

Subject Matter

REVENUE — Ceylon — Revenue — Estate duty — Hindu undivided family — Mitakshara — Death in 1934 of son, one of two surviving coparceners — Ceylon assets of family business — Coparcener has no “share” in family property — His interest not “property passing” on his death — Not property of which he was “competent to dispose” — Not an interest “ceasing on his death” — Not liable to estate duty — Estate Duty Ordinance, No. 8 of 1919, ss. 7, 8 (1) (a) (b).

REVENUE — Estate duty.

REVENUE — Ceylon — Revenue — Estate duty — Hindu undivided family — Mitakshara — Death in 1934 of son, one of two surviving coparceners — Ceylon assets of family business — Coparcener has no “share” in family property — His interest not “property passing” on his death — Not property of which he was “competent to dispose” — Not an interest “ceasing on his death” — Not liable to estate duty — Estate Duty Ordinance, No. 8 of 1919, ss. 7, 8 (1) (a) (b).

REVENUE — Estate duty.

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies