[PRIVY COUNCIL.]
ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF CEYLON APPELLANT; AND AR. ARUNACHALAM CHETTIAR AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS.
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CEYLON.
1957 July 10.
VISCOUNT SIMONDS, LORD REID, LORD COHEN, LORD SOMERVELL OF HARROW and MR. L. M. D. DE SILVA.
CeylonRevenueEstate dutyHindu undivided familyMitaksharaDeath in 1934 of son, one of two surviving coparcenersCeylon assets of family businessCoparcener has no “share” in family propertyHis interest not “property passing” on his deathNot property of which he was “competent to dispose”Not an interest “ceasing on his death”Not liable to estate duty Estate Duty Ordinance, No. 8 of 1919, ss. 7, 8 (1) (a) (b).
RevenueEstate duty.

Subscribe or Register to access the full Law Report. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies