Hearings
United Kingdom
05 Jan 2026 [2025] UKFTT 1209 (GRC), FTT
Daniel Morris v Information Commissioner
AI Summary & Issues
Content generated by AI, as supplied by Jurisage. Learn more about AI Case Summaries.
In the First-tier Tribunal, Daniel Morris's application against the Information Commissioner was struck out for lack of reasonable prospects of success. Morris sought a response to his complaint, but the Commissioner had already issued an outcome. The Tribunal deemed further action futile, as it could not address the merits of the original complaint. Therefore, the application was dismissed under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure Rules.
Issues
- Did the Tribunal determine whether Mr Morris's application met the necessary criteria under section 166 DPA18 for a valid complaint against the Information Commissioner?
- Was there a failure by the Information Commissioner to respond to Mr Morris's complaint within the stipulated three-month period as required by the UKGDPR and DPA18?
- Did the Tribunal find that the Information Commissioner had already provided an outcome to Mr Morris's complaint, thereby limiting the Tribunal's ability to require further action?