Avon Freeholds Ltd v Cresta Court E RTM Co Ltd

Subject Matter

LANDLORD AND TENANT — Right to manage — Validity of claim — Right to manage company seeking to acquire right to manage premises consisting of flats let on long leases — Company not serving notice of invitation to participate on lessee holding recently granted and as yet unregistered lease — Whether lessee under such lease “qualifying tenant” to whom notice of invitation to participate required to be given — Whether failure to serve such notice on all qualifying tenants invalidating company’s subsequent claim notice — Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (c 15), ss 75, 76(2), 78, 79(2), 112(2)

[2024] UKUT 335 (LC); [2025] 1 WLR 1262; [2024] WLR(D) 529, UT

[2025] EWCA Civ 1016; [2025] WLR(D) 418, CA

AI Summary & Issues

Content generated by AI, as supplied by Jurisage. Learn more about AI Case Summaries.

The following text summary is AI generated.
In Avon Freeholds Limited v. Cresta Court E RTM Company Ltd, the Court of Appeal upheld the Upper Tribunal's finding that Ms O'Connor was a qualifying tenant, despite her unregistered lease at the claim notice's service. However, the court determined that the absence of a participation notice rendered the claim notice invalid under section 79(2) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. As a result, Avon Freeholds Limited's appeal was allowed, confirming that the RTM company could not validly acquire the right to manage the property.
The following list of issues is AI generated. Issues
  • Did the court determine whether Ms O'Connor was a qualifying tenant despite her lease not being registered at the time the claim notice was served?
  • Did the court consider whether the failure to provide a participation notice to Ms O'Connor invalidated the claim notice served by the RTM company under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002?
  • Was the interpretation of the statutory provisions regarding participation notices and qualifying tenants influenced by the Supreme Court's decision in A1 Properties?

Commentary

Gatehouse Chambers
Take notice of these decisions Case comment

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies