GH v GH

Subject Matter

PRACTICE — Case management — Financial remedies proceedings — Judge dispensing with financial dispute resolution appointment — Whether such appointment key element in financial remedies procedure — Whether judge erring by proceeding directly to final hearing — FPR r 9.15(4)(b), PD 9A, para 6.1

[2024] EWHC 2547 (Fam); [2024] 4 WLR 90; [2025] 2 All ER 202; [2025] 1 FLR 650; [2024] WLR(D) 422, Fam D

Commentary

Financial Remedies Journal
GH v GH – FDRs Are Not to Be Dispensed With Case comment

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies