Unitel SA v dos Santos

Additional names

Isabel dos Santos v Unitel SA

Subject Matter

INJUNCTION — Freezing order — Application

[2023] EWHC 3231 (Comm), KBD

INJUNCTION — Freezing order — Application — Claimant applying for worldwide freezing order — Whether claimant having “good arguable case” on merits of substantive claim — Meaning of “good arguable case”

[2024] EWCA Civ 1109; [2025] KB 438; [2025] 2 WLR 255; [2025] 2 All ER 606; [2025] 2 All ER (Comm) 587; [2024] WLR(D) 433, CA

INJUNCTION — Freezing order — Costs of application — Claimant successfully applying for freezing order — Whether defendant to pay claimant’s costs of application or costs to be reserved to trial

[2024] EWCA Civ 1109; [2025] KB 438; [2025] 2 WLR 255; [2025] 2 All ER 606; [2025] 2 All ER (Comm) 587; [2024] WLR(D) 433, CA

Commentary

36 Group
Clarity on the Merits Threshold for Freezing Injunctions: the Court of Appeal in Isabel dos Santos v Unitel S.A. Case comment

4 New Square
A rose by any other name: ‘a good arguable case’ in Isabel dos Santos v Unitel Case comment

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies