In re McAleenon

Subject Matter

JUDICIAL REVIEW — Alternative remedy — Whether judicial review appropriate — Claim for judicial review against regulators in respect of emissions from waste disposal site — Whether prosecution or nuisance claim against site owners suitable alternative remedy — Whether claim for judicial review requiring resolution of questions of fact — Proper approach to determining whether claimant having suitable alternative remedy

[2024] UKSC 31; [2025] AC 1362; [2024] 3 WLR 803; [2025] 1 All ER 577, SC(NI)

Commentary

Public Law for Everyone
Judicial review 101: McAleenon in the Supreme Court Case comment

Law and Policy Blog
A blow against the “alternative remedies” excuse: the UK Supreme Court makes it far harder for regulators to avoid performing their public law duties Case comment

Henderson chambers
Regulators must regulate lawfully: The availability of private law claims and remedies does not oust judicial review Case comment

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies