In re Great Annual Savings Co Ltd

Subject Matter

COMPANY — Reorganisation of debt — Company in financial difficulties — Company seeking court’s sanction of restructuring plan — Court having jurisdiction to sanction plan even if not agreed by requisite majority of plan creditors — Exercise of jurisdiction dependent on court being satisfied no member of dissenting class would be worse off if plan sanctioned than under relevant alternative — Expert evidence put forward by proposer of plan indicating requirement satisfied — Dissenting creditor not adducing expert evidence to contrary — Whether court obliged to accept proposer’s evidence — Companies Act 2006 (c 46), s 901G

[2023] EWHC 1141 (Ch); [2023] Bus LR 1163; [2023] 2 BCLC 278; [2023] WLR(D) 232, Ch D

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies