R v AUH

Additional names

R v BIY

Subject Matter

LOCAL GOVERNMENT — Powers — Prosecution — Local authority’s power to bring prosecution for consumer offences — Whether offences charged “consumer offences” — Whether consent of Director of Public Prosecutions required before bringing prosecution for unauthorised moneylending — Whether judge’s indication that prosecution should elect between offences “ruling” against which appeal lying — Whether local authority conducting litigation through person neither authorised nor exempt — Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (c 25), s 35(1) — Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (c 8), s 401(2) — Legal Services Act 2007 (c 29), s 12, Sch 2, para 4(1)(b), Sch 3, para 2(4)(a) — Consumer Rights Act 2015 (c 15), Sch 5, para 46(1)

[2023] EWCA Crim 6; [2023] 1 WLR 1399; [2023] 1 Cr App R 17; [2023] WLR(D) 28, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Introduction B21.2

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies