Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers v Tesco Stores Ltd

Subject Matter

EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Implied term — Employment contracts providing for entitlement to enhanced pay on “permanent” basis — Express term also allowing for termination of employment on provision of notice — Employer seeking to terminate contracts and re-engage employees on terms not including enhanced pay entitlement — Meaning of “permanent” — Whether term to be implied to effect employer not to exercise express right to terminate for purposes of removing entitlement to enhanced pay

[2022] EWHC 201 (QB); [2022] ICR 722; [2022] WLR(D) 63, QBD

EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Implied term — Employer seeking to relocate employees — Employees agreeing to new contracts with provision for retained pay as incentive to relocate — Retained pay expressed to be “permanent” contractual feature “guaranteed for life” — Employer subsequently seeking to terminate contracts and re-engage employees on terms not including entitlement to retained pay — Whether employer entitled to do so — Whether prevented by term to be implied in employment contracts or by estoppel

[2022] EWCA Civ 978; [2022] ICR 1573; [2023] 1 All ER 326; [2022] WLR(D) 312, CA

EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Implied term — Employer seeking to relocate employees — Employees agreeing to new contracts with provision for retained pay as incentive to relocate — Retained pay expressed to be “permanent” contractual feature “guaranteed for life” — Contracts containing term entitling employer to terminate contract on provision of notice — Employer seeking to terminate contracts and re-engage employees on terms not including entitlement to retained pay — Whether employer entitled to do so — Whether prevented by term to be implied in contracts

[2024] UKSC 28; [2025] ICR 107; [2025] 2 All ER 565; [2024] IRLR 998, SC(E)

EMPLOYMENT — Contract of employment — Injunction — Employer seeking to terminate contracts with provision for retained pay and re-engage employees on terms not including entitlement to retained pay — Employees seeking injunction requiring employer to continue employing them on retained pay — Whether damages adequate — Whether breakdown of mutual trust and confidence — Whether injunction to be granted

[2024] UKSC 28; [2025] ICR 107; [2025] 2 All ER 565; [2024] IRLR 998, SC(E)

Appellate History

Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers v Tesco Stores Ltd [2022] EWHC 201 (QB); [2022] ICR 722; [2022] WLR(D) 63, QBD

Decision of Ellenbogen J sitting in the Queen’s Bench Division reversed

Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers v Tesco Stores Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 978; [2022] ICR 1573; [2023] 1 All ER 326; [2022] WLR(D) 312, CA

Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers v Tesco Stores Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 978; [2022] ICR 1573; [2023] 1 All ER 326; [2022] WLR(D) 312, CA

Decision of the Court of Appeal reversed

Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers v Tesco Stores Ltd [2024] UKSC 28; [2025] ICR 107; [2025] 2 All ER 565; [2024] IRLR 998, SC(E)

Commentary

UK Labour Law
Limiting an employer’s right to dismiss on notice: Aspden v Webbs Poultry and USDAW v Tesco Case comment

Blackstone Chambers
Damages as an adequate remedy in Employee Competition claims Case comment

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies