CDE v NOP

Subject Matter

PRACTICE — Hearing — Whether in private — Defendants accused in court proceedings of having orchestrated fraud — Same allegations subject of separate confidential arbitration award made against companies connected to defendants — Claimants applying to rely on arbitrator’s findings — Judge ordering case management conference to be heard in private — Whether hearing involving confidential information — Whether publicity would damage confidentiality — Whether hearing in private necessary to secure proper administration of justice — CPR r 39.2(3)(a)(c)

[2021] EWCA Civ 1908; [2022] 4 WLR 6; [2022] 2 All ER (Comm) 691; [2022] BLR 108; [2021] WLR(D) 632, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Claims under the Arbitration Act 1996 - Hearings 72.17

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies