M/V Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Osios David Shipping Inc

Subject Matter

SHIPPING — Collision — Security for claim — Claimant’s and defendant’s vessels colliding — Each party required under standard form collision jurisdiction agreement to provide security for other party’s claim in form reasonably satisfactory to that party — Claimant’s P&I club offering security for defendant’s claim by way of letter of undertaking — Defendant refusing to accept security because of inclusion in letter of sanctions clause — Judge holding security in form reasonably satisfactory to defendant — Whether defendant contractually obliged to accept it — ASG 2 Collision Jurisdiction Agreement, clause C

[2021] EWHC 2808 (Comm); [2023] 1 All ER (Comm) 213; [2022] 1 Lloyd's Rep 261, QBD

[2022] EWCA Civ 798; [2022] Bus LR 698; [2023] 1 All ER (Comm) 213; [2022] 2 Lloyd's Rep 448; [2022] WLR(D) 263, CA

Appellate History

M/V Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Osios David Shipping Inc [2021] EWHC 2808 (Comm); [2023] 1 All ER (Comm) 213; [2022] 1 Lloyd's Rep 261, QBD

Decision of Sir Nigel Teare sitting as a judge of the Queen’s Bench Division reversed

M/V Pacific Pearl Co Ltd v Osios David Shipping Inc [2022] EWCA Civ 798; [2022] Bus LR 698; [2023] 1 All ER (Comm) 213; [2022] 2 Lloyd's Rep 448; [2022] WLR(D) 263, CA

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies