R v Margelis

Subject Matter

CRIME — Explosive substances — “Pyrotechnic effect” — Defendant posting parcels containing devices designed to ignite and set fire to address labels — Whether devices “explosive substances” — Whether devices used or manufactured with view to producing “pyrotechnic effect” — Explosives Act 1875 (38 & 39 Vict c 17), s 3 — Explosive Substances Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict c 3), s 4(1) — Pyrotechnic Articles (Safety) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/1553), reg 3(1)

[2021] EWCA Crim 1215; [2022] QB 148; [2021] 3 WLR 1411; [2022] 1 Cr App R 3; [2021] WLR(D) 449, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Causing Explosion Likely to Endanger Life or Property - Explosive Substance and Explosion - ‘Explosive’ B12.248

Making or Possession of Explosive under Suspicious Circumstances B12.260

Fireworks Offences - Possession of Pyrotechnic Articles at Musical Events B12.287

Questions of Law and Fact - In a Trial on Indictment: General Principles - Construction of Words F1.38

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies