Candey Ltd v Tonstate Group Ltd

Subject Matter

SOLICITOR — Costs — Damages-based agreement — Solicitors acting for client in litigation — Agreement providing client only liable to pay for solicitors’ services in event of recovering damages or deriving benefits from litigation — Client unsuccessful in litigation apart from resisting claim for him to return shares in company — Whether solicitors entitled to payment under agreement — Whether agreement between non-counterclaiming defendant and solicitors capable of being enforceable “damages-based agreement” — Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (c 41), s 58AA(3) — Damages-Based Agreements Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/609), regs 1(2), 4(3)

[2022] EWCA Civ 936; [2022] 1 WLR 4653; [2023] 2 All ER 138; [2022] WLR(D) 295, CA

Appellate History

Tonstate Group Ltd v Wojakovski [2021] EWHC 1122 (Ch); [2021] Costs LR 555, Ch D

Decision of Zacaroli J sitting in the Chancery Division affirmed

Candey Ltd v Tonstate Group Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 936; [2022] 1 WLR 4653; [2023] 2 All ER 138; [2022] WLR(D) 295, CA

Candey Ltd v Tonstate Group Ltd [2021] EWHC 1826 (Ch), Ch D

Decision of Zacaroli J sitting in the Chancery Division affirmed

Candey Ltd v Tonstate Group Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 936; [2022] 1 WLR 4653; [2023] 2 All ER 138; [2022] WLR(D) 295, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Damages-Based Agreements - Requirements for DBAs 5.17

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies