Hearings
England & Wales
15 Jan 2021 [2021] EWHC 56 (QB), QBD (Jay J)
21 Dec 2021 [2021] EWCA Civ 1952; [2022] QB 533; [2022] 2 WLR 807; [2022] WLR(D) 9, CA (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing, Warby LJJ)
15 Jan 2021 [2021] EWHC 56 (QB), QBD (Jay J)
21 Dec 2021 [2021] EWCA Civ 1952; [2022] QB 533; [2022] 2 WLR 807; [2022] WLR(D) 9, CA (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing, Warby LJJ)
DEFAMATION — Practice — Preliminary issues
[2021] EWHC 56 (QB), QBD
DEFAMATION — Foreign defendant — Jurisdiction — Claimant bringing defamation action against defendants domiciled outside United Kingdom in respect of statements published online — Whether England and Wales clearly most appropriate place in which to bring action — Whether and to what extent statute modifying forum conveniens regime — Whether evidential burden on defendant — Whether defendant required to adduce expert evidence about foreign law — Defamation Act 2013 (c 26), s 9
[2021] EWCA Civ 1952; [2022] QB 533; [2022] 2 WLR 807; [2022] WLR(D) 9, CA
Soriano v Forensic News LLC [2021] EWHC 56 (QB), QBD
Decision of Jay J affirmed on partly different grounds
Soriano v Forensic News LLC [2021] EWCA Civ 1952; [2022] QB 533; [2022] 2 WLR 807; [2022] WLR(D) 9, CA
Inforrm's blog
Case Law: Soriano v Forensic News LLP: Part 1, Guidance on the Extraterritorial effect of the GDPR in publication claims
Case comment
Case Law: Soriano v Forensic News LLP: Part 2, The application of section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 Case comment
Panopticon
Overseas websites and the GDPR’s reach
Case comment
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies