18 Dec 2019 [2019] UKET 2200909/2019, ET (Employment Judge Tayler)
10 Jun 2021 UKEAT/105/20; [2022] ICR 1, EAT (Choudhury J (President), Mr C Edwards, Ms M V McArthur)
06 Jul 2022 (Rehearing) Transcript PDF; Press summary, ET (Employment Judge Glennie)
DISCRIMINATION — Religion or belief — Philosophical belief — Claimant holding gender-critical belief — Claimant commenting on social media that sex determined at birth and incapable of change — Whether belief not worthy of respect as being in conflict with rights of others — Whether “philosophical belief” — Equality Act 2010 (c 15), s 10
UKEAT/105/20; [2022] ICR 1, EAT
Forstater v CGD Europe [2019] UKET 2200909/2019, ET
Decision of employment tribunal reversed
Forstater v CGD Europe UKEAT/105/20; [2022] ICR 1, EAT
UK Human Rights Blog
Be Careful What You Tweet For (part 1)
Case comment
Be Careful What You Tweet For (part 2) Case comment
UK Labour Law
The Forstater Employment Tribunal judgment: a critical appraisal in light of Miller
Case comment
Against withdrawal: Extending responsibility to “philosophical beliefs” Case comment
Law & Religion UK
“Sex” vs “gender identity” as a philosophical belief: Forstater
Case comment
Gender-critical opinions and philosophical belief: Forstater again Case update
Old Square chambers
Forstater v CGD Europe & others UKEAT/0105/20/JOJ, 10 June 2021
Case comment
Law and Religion Australia
Belief that sex is immutable can be a protected belief
Case comment
UK Labour Law
Speak … Out: On the physical boundaries of free speech in education and employment law
Case comment
Law & Religion UK
Gender-critical views: Forstater again
Case comment
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies