Etihad Airways PJSC v Flöther

Subject Matter

CONFLICT OF LAWS — Jurisdiction under European Union Regulation — Exclusive jurisdiction — Facility agreement containing asymmetric jurisdiction clause entitling borrower to sue lender in England only but entitling lender to bring proceedings in courts of any competent jurisdiction — Lender also providing borrower with comfort letter containing no jurisdiction provision — Borrower starting proceedings against lender in Germany under comfort letter — Lender subsequently starting mirror proceedings against borrower in England — Whether English court to stay proceedings as court second seised — Whether jurisdiction clause applying to dispute arising in connection with comfort letter — Whether such dispute arising in connection with “particular legal relationship” between parties — Whether asymmetric jurisdiction clause capable of conferring “exclusive jurisdiction” on English courts — Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, arts 25, 31(2)

[2019] EWHC 3107 (Comm); [2020] QB 793; [2020] 2 WLR 333; [2019] WLR(D) 675, QBD

CONFLICT OF LAWS — Jurisdiction under European Union Regulation — Exclusive jurisdiction — Facility agreement containing asymmetric jurisdiction clause entitling borrower to sue lender in England only but entitling lender to bring proceedings in courts of any competent jurisdiction — Borrower starting proceedings against lender in Germany — Lender subsequently starting mirror proceedings against borrower in England — Whether English court to stay proceedings as court second seised — Whether asymmetric jurisdiction clause capable of conferring “exclusive jurisdiction” on English courts — Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, arts 25, 29, 31(2)

[2020] EWCA Civ 1707; [2022] QB 303; [2021] 2 WLR 939; [2021] 2 All ER (Comm) 1249; [2020] WLR(D) 690, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005 80.13

Jurisdiction under the 2005 Hague Convention - Exclusive jurisdiction - Exclusive 16.26

Lis pendens - Identical proceedings 16.9

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies