Hearings
England & Wales
05 Jul 2019 [2019] EWHC 1733 (IPEC); [2020] FSR 1, Ch D (Judge Hacon)
07 May 2020 [2020] EWCA Civ 609; [2021] Ch 201; [2020] 3 WLR 810; [2020] WLR(D) 278, CA (David Richards, Flaux, Arnold LJJ)
05 Jul 2019 [2019] EWHC 1733 (IPEC); [2020] FSR 1, Ch D (Judge Hacon)
07 May 2020 [2020] EWCA Civ 609; [2021] Ch 201; [2020] 3 WLR 810; [2020] WLR(D) 278, CA (David Richards, Flaux, Arnold LJJ)
SOLICITOR — Duty — Confidential information — Claimants’ claim compromised by way of settlement agreement containing confidentiality clause binding on parties but not legal representatives — Defendant’s solicitors subsequently acting for different defendants in later claim brought by same claimants — Claimants applying for order restraining solicitors from continuing to act — Whether application falling within special jurisdiction arising where solicitor acting against former client — Whether burden on solicitors to show no risk of misuse of confidential information and prejudice to claimants — Whether solicitors to be restrained from continuing to act
[2020] EWCA Civ 609; [2021] Ch 201; [2020] 3 WLR 810; [2020] WLR(D) 278, CA
Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd v Product Specialities Inc (trading as Final Touch) [2019] EWHC 1733 (IPEC); [2020] FSR 1, Ch D
Decision of Judge Hacon QC sitting in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court affirmed
Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd v Product Specialities Inc (trading as Final Touch) [2020] EWCA Civ 609; [2021] Ch 201; [2020] 3 WLR 810; [2020] WLR(D) 278, CA
The IP Kat
What's a fiduciary duty got to do with it? Lawyers, successive parties, and confidentiality
Case comment
Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Conflicts between Clients - Restraining a solicitor from acting
21.8
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies