R v Patten (Ralph)

Subject Matter

CRIME — Jury — Verdict — Judge directing jury of 11 that he would accept verdicts on which nine of them agreed — Direction inconsistent with statutory requirement that ten jurors required for majority verdict from jury of 11 — Whether misdirection invalidating all verdicts which followed or only those expressed to be by majority of nine — Juries Act 1974 (c 23), s 17(1)

[2018] EWCA Crim 2492; [2019] 1 WLR 5265; [2019] 2 Cr App R 21; [2019] WLR (D) 307, CA

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies