Guest v Guest

Hearings

England & Wales

16 Apr 2019 [2019] EWHC 869 (Ch), Ch D (Judge Russen QC sitting as a High Court judge)

17 Mar 2020 [2020] EWCA Civ 387; [2020] 1 WLR 3480; [2021] 1 All ER 503; [2020] WLR (D) 170, CA (Floyd, Newey, Arnold LJJ)

15 Dec 2020 (appn all) [2021] 1 WLR 750, SC(E) (Lady Black, Lady Arden, Lord Stephens JJSC)

19 Oct 2022 [2022] UKSC 27; [2024] AC 833; [2022] 3 WLR 911; [2023] 1 All ER 695; [2023] 1 FLR 590, SC(E) (Lord Briggs, Lord Leggatt, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose JJSC, Lady Arden)

Subject Matter

ESTOPPEL — Conduct, by — Proprietary estoppel

[2019] EWHC 869 (Ch), Ch D

ESTOPPEL — Conduct by — Proprietary estoppel — Claimant living and working on defendants’ farm for over 30 years — Claimant seeking declaration of beneficial interest in farm on basis of detrimental reliance on defendants’ assurances he would inherit — Judge allowing claim and awarding lump sum representing percentage of market value of farm and farming business — Whether judge applying correct test to consideration of remedy — Whether judge required to consider extent of equity arising — Whether remedy to be determined by reference to objectively assessed intention of person making assurance

[2020] EWCA Civ 387; [2020] 1 WLR 3480; [2021] 1 All ER 503; [2020] WLR (D) 170, CA

ESTOPPEL — Conduct by — Proprietary estoppel — Claimant living and working on defendants’ farm for very low wages for 30 years — Claimant seeking declaration of beneficial interest in farm on basis of detrimental reliance on defendants’ promises he would inherit — Judge finding proprietary estoppel established — Proper approach to remedy to be awarded — 2016090749Whether binary choice between enforcing promise and compensating for detriment

[2022] UKSC 27; [2024] AC 833; [2022] 3 WLR 911; [2023] 1 All ER 695; [2023] 1 FLR 590, SC(E)

ESTOPPEL — Conduct by — Proprietary estoppel — Claimant living and working on parents’ farm for very low wages for 30 years — Claimant seeking declaration of beneficial interest in farm on basis of detrimental reliance on parents’ promises he would inherit — Judge finding proprietary estoppel established — Proper approach to remedy — Whether binary choice between enforcing promise and compensating for detriment

[2022] UKSC 27; [2024] AC 833; [2022] 3 WLR 911; [2023] 1 All ER 695; [2023] 1 FLR 590, SC(E)

Commentary

3PB Barristers
Guest and another v Guest [2022] UKSC 27 – “Proprietary Estoppel: Expectation vs Reality” Case comment

UK Supreme Court Blog
Case Comment: Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27 Case comment

Trusts & Trustees
Clear as mud: Proprietary Estoppel after Guest v Guest Case comment

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies