In re Barclays Bank plc

Subject Matter

FINANCIAL SERVICES — Business transfer — Sanction — First and second interconnected banks seeking to transfer part of banking businesses — Court only having jurisdiction to sanction bank transfer scheme if transferor deposit-taking institution — Second bank not having authorisation to accept deposits — Whether court having jurisdiction to order transfer of second bank’s business as matter incidental, consequential and supplementary to first bank’s scheme and necessary to secure scheme fully carried out — Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (c 8), s 112(1)(d)

[2018] EWHC 2868 (Ch); [2020] Bus LR 497; [2019] 2 All ER (Comm) 356; [2019] 1 BCLC 330; [2019] WLR(D) 535, Ch D

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies