Toms v Ruberry

Subject Matter

LANDLORD AND TENANT — Forfeiture of lease — Re-entry — Right of re-entry for breach of covenant not enforceable until landlord serving on tenant notice specifying particular breach — Landlord alleging tenant in breach of covenant and serving notice — Particular breach relied on not specified in notice — Particular breach relied on not yet occurring — Whether right of re-entry arising — Whether notice valid — Law of Property Act 1925 (15 & 16 Geo 5, c 20), s 146(1)

[2017] EWHC 2970 (QB); [2018] 1 WLR 1138; [2017] WLR (D) 783, QBD

[2019] EWCA Civ 128; [2019] QB 937; [2019] 2 WLR 975; [2019] 3 All ER 170; [2019] WLR(D) 74; [2019] WLR (D) 74, CA

LANDLORD AND TENANT — Forfeiture of lease — Re-entry — Landlord’s right of re-entry or foreiture under lease for tenant’s breach of covenant — Statute providing such right not enforceable until landlord serving notice on tenant specifying breach of covenant complained of — Whether notice valid if given before contractual right of re-entry otherwise enforceable — Law of Property Act 1925 (15 & 16 Geo 5, c 20), s 146(1)

[2019] EWCA Civ 128; [2019] QB 937; [2019] 2 WLR 975; [2019] 3 All ER 170; [2019] WLR(D) 74; [2019] WLR (D) 74, CA

Commentary

New Law Journal
Old meets new (2019) 169 NLJ 7839, p 13

Section 146: a modern interpretation (2019) 169 NLJ 7842, p 14

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies