Farrell v Whitty (No 2)

Hearings

European Union

10 Oct 2017 (Case C-413/15); EU:C:2017:745; EU:C:2017:492; [2018] QB 1179; [2018] 3 WLR 285; [2018] Lloyd's Rep IR 103; [2019] RTR 11; [2017] WLR (D) 659, ECJ (President K Lenaerts, Vice-President A Tizzano, Presidents of Chambers R Silva de Lapuerta, M Ilešič, L Bay Larsen, A Rosas, J Malenovský, Judges E Juhász, A Borg Barthet, D Šváby, M Berger, A Prechal, K Jürimäe, C Lycourgos, M Vilaras Advocate General E Sharpston)

Subject Matter

EUROPEAN UNION — Directive — Direct effect — Provisions of Directive having direct effect and conferring rights on individuals — Compulsory motor insurance — Organisation responsible for compensating for damage caused by unidentified or uninsured driver — Rule that provisions of Directive could be relied on against organisations which were emanations of state — Whether restricted to organisations which both were subject to control of state and had special powers conferred by state — Whether Directives capable of having direct effect could be relied on against body not displaying both characteristics — Whether individual could rely on provisions against bodies displaying one characteristic — Guidance to courts — FEU Treaty, art 288FEU — Council Directive 84/5/EEC (as amended by Council Directive 90/232/EEC), art 1(4)

(Case C-413/15); EU:C:2017:745; EU:C:2017:492; [2018] QB 1179; [2018] 3 WLR 285; [2018] Lloyd's Rep IR 103; [2019] RTR 11; [2017] WLR (D) 659, ECJ

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies