04 Aug 2016 (unreported) , QBD (Roberts J)
12 Oct 2017 [2017] EWCA Civ 1545; [2017] 4 WLR 206; [2018] 1 FLR 1333; [2018] 1 FCR 289; [2017] WLR (D) 653; The Times, 30 October 2017, CA (Gloster, Lewison and King LJJ)
12 Mar 2018 Permission to appeal to Supreme Court refused
MARRIAGE — Divorce — Financial provision — Wife due to receive substantial inheritance from father under Saudi Arabian laws of forced heirship — Whether to be taken into account as financial resource wife “likely to have in the foreseeable future” — Whether grant of occupational interest in former matrimonial home rather than lump sum appropriate order — Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (c 18), s 25(2) (as amended by Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (c 42), s 3, Pensions Act 1995 (c 26), s 166(2), Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999 (c 30), s 19 and Pensions Act 2008 (c 30), s 149(1))
[2017] EWCA Civ 1545; [2017] 4 WLR 206; [2018] 1 FLR 1333; [2018] 1 FCR 289; [2017] WLR (D) 653; The Times, 30 October 2017, CA
Alireza v Radwan (unreported) , QBD
Decision of Roberts J reversed
Alireza v Radwan [2017] EWCA Civ 1545; [2017] 4 WLR 206; [2018] 1 FLR 1333; [2018] 1 FCR 289; [2017] WLR (D) 653; The Times, 30 October 2017, CA
Financial Remedy Channel
Future inheritance prospects and financial resources
Case comment
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies