15 Mar 2018 [2018] EWHC 549 (Fam), Fam D (Judge Wildblood QC sitting as a judge of the Family Division)
31 Aug 2017 [2017] EWCA Civ 1306; [2018] Fam 93; [2018] 2 WLR 509; [2018] 1 FLR 1283; [2017] WLR (D) 585, CA (Lloyd Jones, Beatson, Moylan LJJ)
MARRIAGE — Divorce — Financial provision — Identification of assets — “Non-matrimonial property” — Build-up of husband’s assets in decades prior to marriage — Judge awarding wife over one third of capital assets following parties’ separation in financial remedies order—Whether equal division of assets appropriate — Guidelines on court’s approach to non-matrimonial and matrimonial property when applying sharing principle — Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (c 18), s 25(2) (as substituted by Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (c 42), ss 3, 48(2) and amended by Pensions Act 1995 (c 26), s 166(2) and Pensions Act 2008 (c 30), s 120, Sch 6, para 4)
[2017] EWCA Civ 1306; [2018] Fam 93; [2018] 2 WLR 509; [2018] 1 FLR 1283; [2017] WLR (D) 585, CA
Hart v Hart [2018] EWHC 549 (Fam), Fam D
Decision of Judge Wildblood QC sitting as a judge of the Family Division affirmed
Hart v Hart [2017] EWCA Civ 1306; [2018] Fam 93; [2018] 2 WLR 509; [2018] 1 FLR 1283; [2017] WLR (D) 585, CA
Family Law Week
Financial remedies appeal considering the correct approach to non-matrimonial property when determining a claim by application of the sharing principle.
Case summary
Transparency Project
Solicitors in a state of flux
Case comment
Hart Felt: (Non)Matrimonial Money in Hart v Hart Case comment
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies