Harrison v University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust

Subject Matter

COSTS — Costs management — Approval of costs budget — Costs management order in medical negligence claim — Detailed assessment by costs judge after settlement of claim — Whether departure from approved costs budget permissible only for “good reason” — Whether same requirement for costs incurred pre-budget — When case “commenced” for purposes of transitional provisions relating to proportionality — CPR r 3.18, Practice Direction 3E, para 7.4, r 44.3(7)(a)

[2017] EWCA Civ 792; [2017] 1 WLR 4456; [2017] WLR (D) 420, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Civil Procedure Rules 1998 - Presumptions relating to identical and different wording 1.18

Civil Procedure Rules 1998 - Claim, cause, proceedings, case, action, matter 1.21

Civil Procedure Rules 1998 - Purposive interpretation 1.16

Civil Procedure Rules 1998 - Issue, start, commence, brought, made 1.22

Costs Budgets and the Costs of the Proceedings - Assessment where there is a costs management order 43.21

Costs Budgets - Nature of costs budgets 43.5

Agreement or Approval of Costs Budgets - Agreed or approved costs budgets in subsequent interim applications 43.13

Agreement or Approval of Costs Budgets - Incurred costs 43.11

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies