Hearings
England & Wales
10 Aug 2016 [2016] EWHC 2040 (Admin); [2016] EWHC 2040 Admin, QBD (Lewis J)
04 May 2017 [2017] EWCA Civ 328; [2017] ICR 1145; [2017] WLR (D) 311, CA (Lord Justice Longmore, Lord Justice Underhill)
10 Aug 2016 [2016] EWHC 2040 (Admin); [2016] EWHC 2040 Admin, QBD (Lewis J)
04 May 2017 [2017] EWCA Civ 328; [2017] ICR 1145; [2017] WLR (D) 311, CA (Lord Justice Longmore, Lord Justice Underhill)
TRADE UNION — Recognition — Reference to central arbitration committee — Union proposing group of employees as appropriate bargaining unit — Proposed group comprising 1.5% of workers in same category within workforce — Whether undesirable as creating “small fragmented bargaining units” — Whether single bargaining unit with no likelihood of proliferation capable of amounting to “small fragmented bargaining units” — Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (c 52), Sch A1, paras 19, 19B(2)(3)(c) (as amended by Employment Relations Act 2004 (c 24), ss 1, 4)
[2017] EWCA Civ 328; [2017] ICR 1145; [2017] WLR (D) 311, CA
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS — Trade union recognition — Bargaining unit
R (Lidl Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee [2016] EWHC 2040 (Admin); [2016] EWHC 2040 Admin, QBD
Decision of Lewis J affirmed
R (Lidl Ltd) v Central Arbitration Committee [2017] EWCA Civ 328; [2017] ICR 1145; [2017] WLR (D) 311, CA
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies