Thum v Thum

Subject Matter

MARRIAGE — Divorce — Service — Wife issuing divorce petition in High Court but petition not served forthwith — Husband issuing petition in Germany prior to service of wife’s petition — Whether delay in service constituting failure to take required steps necessary for issuing court to remain seised — CPR r 7.5 — FPR r 7.8 — Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, art 16

[2016] EWHC 2634 (Fam); [2016] 4 WLR 171; [2016] WLR (D) 573, Fam D

MARRIAGE — Divorce — Service — Wife issuing divorce petition in High Court but petition not served forthwith — Husband issuing petition in Germany prior to service of wife’s petition — Whether wife failing to take “steps … required … to have service effected” on husband — Whether High Court deemed to have been seised when wife’s petition issued — FPR r 7.8 — Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, art 16(1)(a)

[2018] EWCA Civ 624; [2019] Fam 226; [2019] 2 WLR 127; [2019] 1 FLR 380; [2018] WLR (D) 444, CA

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies