Hobohm v Benedikt Kampik Ltd & Co KG

Additional names

Rüdiger Hobohm v Benedikt Kampik Ltd & Co. KG and Others

Subject Matter

CONFLICT OF LAWS — Jurisdiction under Council Regulation — Special jurisdiction — Consumer contracts — Consumer in first member state concluding first contract with intermediary in second member state in course of professional activity which intermediary “directs … to” member state of consumer’s domicile — Second contract concluded between same parties designed to achieve economic objective of first contract — Second contract not itself within scope of professional activity directed by intermediary to member state of consumer’s domicile — Whether courts of consumer’s domicile having jurisdiction over dispute concerning second contract — Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, arts 15(1)(c), 16(1)

(Case C-297/14); [2016] QB 616; [2016] 2 WLR 940; [2015] WLR (D) 546; EU:C:2015:556; EU:C:2015:844, ECJ

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Jurisdiction in respect of employment and consumer claims - Consumer claims 16.36

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies