Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office

Subject Matter

CRIME — Sentence — Confiscation order — Confiscation order made against defendant following conviction for drug trafficking offence— Defendant’s wife asserting half interest in matrimonial home and endowment policies held in joint names— Judge finding wife becoming aware after acquisition that proceeds of crime being used to pay mortgage and make policy payments— Whether statutory jurisdiction to confiscate wife’s interest as gift from defendant— Whether public policy conferring jurisdiction to reduce extent of wife’s interest to reflect her guilty knowledge— Drug Trafficking Act 1994 (c 37), s 8

[2008] EWCA Civ 645; [2009] QB 348; [2009] 2 WLR 471; [2008] 2 FLR 1672; The Times, 14 July 2008, CA

Appellate History

Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office [2007] EWHC 1405 (Admin), QBD

Decision of James Goudie QC sitting as a deputy judge of the Queen’s Bench Division reversed

Gibson v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office [2008] EWCA Civ 645; [2009] QB 348; [2009] 2 WLR 471; [2008] 2 FLR 1672; The Times, 14 July 2008, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Making of Confiscation Order - Stage Four — Determination of the Available Amount - Third-party Interests E19.59

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies