Hearings
England & Wales
07 May 2009 [2009] EWHC 958 (QB); [2009] 2 Cr App R 365, QBD
05 Nov 2009 [2009] EWCA Civ 1156; [2010] QB 438; [2010] 2 WLR 1138; [2010] 2 All ER 431; [2010] 1 Cr App R 264; [2009] WLR (D) 317, CA
07 May 2009 [2009] EWHC 958 (QB); [2009] 2 Cr App R 365, QBD
05 Nov 2009 [2009] EWCA Civ 1156; [2010] QB 438; [2010] 2 WLR 1138; [2010] 2 All ER 431; [2010] 1 Cr App R 264; [2009] WLR (D) 317, CA
POLICE — Powers — Detention of evidence — Seizure of evidence — Police searching premises pursuant to search warrant — Property seized — Crown Prosecution Service deciding not to prosecute — Private company proposing to bring private prosecution — Whether police entitled to retain property lawfully seized where private prosecution being contemplated — Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s 22(2)
[2009] 2 Cr App R 365
POLICE — Search, right of — Retention of seized property — Police investigating suspected offences seizing property during execution of warrant — Crown Prosecution Service subsequently deciding not to prosecute — Private commercial organisation wishing to bring private prosecution — Whether police entitled to retain seized property — Whether retention “necessary in all the circumstances” — Whether decision of Crown Prosecution Service determinative — Guidance as to relevant circumstances — Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s 22(1)(2)(a)
Scopelight Ltd v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force [2009] EWHC 958 (QB); [2009] 2 Cr App R 365, QBD
Decision of Sharp J reversed
Scopelight Ltd v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force [2009] EWCA Civ 1156; [2010] QB 438; [2010] 2 WLR 1138; [2010] 2 All ER 431; [2010] 1 Cr App R 264; [2009] WLR (D) 317, CA
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies