Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd

Subject Matter

EVIDENCE — Privilege — “Without prejudice” communications — Parties entering into settlement agreement following “without prejudice” negotiations — Claimant claiming damages against defendants for breach of settlement agreement — Dispute as to proper interpretation of agreement — Defendants contending claimant estopped from denying agreement bearing particular interpretation — Whether evidence of “without prejudice” negotiations admissible for purpose of resolving dispute or establishing estoppel

[2011] 1 AC 662; [2009] 1 WLR 2416; [2010] 1 WLR 1803; [2010] 3 WLR 1424

Appellate History

Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2009] EWHC 1946 (Comm); [2009] 1 WLR 2416; [2009] 2 All ER (Comm) 1021, QBD

Decision of Andrew Smith J reversed

Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 79; [2010] 1 WLR 1803; [2010] 3 All ER 282; [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 176; [2010] 2 Lloyd's Rep 335; [2010] WLR (D) 40, CA

Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 79; [2010] 1 WLR 1803; [2010] 3 All ER 282; [2010] 2 All ER (Comm) 176; [2010] 2 Lloyd's Rep 335; [2010] WLR (D) 40, CA

Decision of the Court of Appeal reversed

Oceanbulk Shipping and Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] UKSC 44; [2011] 1 AC 662; [2010] 3 WLR 1424; [2010] 4 All ER 1011; [2011] 1 All ER (Comm) 1; [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep 96; [2010] WLR (D) 270; Case details, SC(E)

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Without-Prejudice Communications - Proof of settlement 50.118

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies