Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd

Subject Matter

NEGLIGENCE — Causation — Problem gambler — Bookmakers offering self-exclusion agreements to help problem gamblers control habit — Claimant compulsive gambler making self-exclusion agreement with defendant to close his account and prevent him from telephone betting for six months — Defendant not preventing claimant from reopening account and resuming telephone betting — Claimant sustaining substantial gambling losses — Whether caused by defendant's breach of duty — Whether quantification of loss to take account of other gambling losses which claimant would have sustained but for breach of duty — Whether defendant liable in negligence for claimant's losses

[2009] Ch 330; [2009] 2 WLR 1065

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies