12 Oct 2001 [2001] EWCA Civ 1549; [2002] 1 WLR 1359; [2002] 1 All ER 425; [2002] LGR 443, CA (Simon Brown, Peter Gibson and Tuckey LJJ)
22 May 2003 [2003] UKHL 26; [2003] 2 AC 558; [2003] 2 WLR 1547; [2003] 3 All ER 1; [2003] LGR 449, HL(E) (Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Clyde, Lord Hutton and Lord Scott of Foscote)
PLANNING — Planning control — Breach — Local authority's application for injunction — Gipsies occupying mobile homes on own land in breach of planning control — Whether court obliged to consider likely effect of injunction and any penalties for infringement on gipsies' right to respect for home and family life — Whether environmental considerations outweighing gipsies' human rights — Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s 187B (as inserted by Planning and Compensation Act 1991, s 3) — Human Rights Act 1998, s 6(1), Sch 1, Pt I, art 8
[2001] EWCA Civ 1549; [2002] 1 WLR 1359; [2002] 1 All ER 425; [2002] LGR 443, CA
[2003] UKHL 26; [2003] 2 AC 558; [2003] 2 WLR 1547; [2003] 3 All ER 1; [2003] LGR 449, HL(E)
South Bucks District Council v Porter [2001] EWCA Civ 1549; [2002] 1 WLR 1359; [2002] 1 All ER 425; [2002] LGR 443, CA
Decision of the Court of Appeal affirmed
South Bucks District Council v Porter [2003] UKHL 26; [2003] 2 AC 558; [2003] 2 WLR 1547; [2003] 3 All ER 1; [2003] LGR 449, HL(E)
Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Application of the Overriding Objective - Proportionality: examples
1.34
Statutory Authority 37.14
Injunctions 4.14
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies