P & O Nedlloyd BV v Arab Metals Co

Ships

UB Tiger

Additional names

UB Tiger, The

Subject Matter

LIMITATION OF ACTION — Contract, breach of — New cause of action — Claimant's claim for breach of bill of lading contract — Application to amend particulars of claim to plead existence of alternative contract — Application to add claims for declarations concerning and for specific performance of alternative contract — Whether claim for declaration new cause of action — Whether six-year limit in contract applicable to claim for specific performance by analogy — Limitation Act 1980, ss 5, 36(1)(b)

[2005] EWHC 1276 (Comm); [2005] 1 WLR 3733; [2006] 1 Lloyd's Rep 111, QBD

PRACTICE — Pleadings — Amendment — Application to amend particulars of claim after expiry of limitation period — Whether new claims arising out of same or substantially same facts as original claims — Whether amendments to be allowed — CPR r 17.4(2)

[2006] EWCA Civ 1300; [2007] 1 WLR 2483; [2007] 2 Lloyd's Rep 148, CA

Commentary

Blackstones Civil Practice 2023
Principles on which Permission is Granted - Traditional approach 31.5

Principles on which Permission is Granted - Choice between the two approaches 31.7

Amendment after a Relevant Limitation Period has Expired - Same or substantially the same facts - The test 31.27

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies