Mohammed v The State

Subject Matter

CRIME — Trinidad and tobago — Crime — Evidence — Confession — Police failing to inform defendant of constitutional right to communicate with lawyer — Confession obtained in breach of constitutional right — Judge wrongly permitting prosecuting counsel to make closing speech to jury — Whether confession obtained in breach of defendant's constitutional rights admissible — Exercise of discretion — Whether proviso to be applied — Constitution of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Act, Sch, s 5(2)(c)(ii)(h) — Supreme Court of Judicature Act, s 44(1)

[1999] 2 AC 111; [1999] 2 WLR 552

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies