R v Newland

Subject Matter

CRIME — Indictment — Breach of Indictment Rules — Two unrelated groups of counts in one indictment — Order for separate trials of each group — Whether proper — Whether indictment invalid — Whether proceedings after arraignment null — Whether venire de novo to be ordered — Indictments Act 1915, s 5(3) — Indictment Rules 1971, r 9

[1988] QB 402; [1988] 2 WLR 382

Commentary

Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Responsibility for Drafting an Indictment - Ultimate Responsibility D11.6

Responsibility for Drafting an Indictment - Mechanics of Drafting Indictments D11.7

Joinder of Counts in an Indictment - Application of the Rule D11.64

Severance D11.76

Motion to Quash an Indictment - Use of Such Motions by the Prosecution D11.112

Autrefois Acquit and Autrefois Convict - Scope of the Pleas - Findings that Cannot Form Basis for Plea of Autrefois Acquit D12.26

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies