Hearings
England & Wales
03 Dec 1987 [1988] QB 402; [1988] 2 WLR 382; [1988] 2 All ER 891; 87 Cr App R 118, CA
03 Dec 1987 [1988] QB 402; [1988] 2 WLR 382; [1988] 2 All ER 891; 87 Cr App R 118, CA
CRIME — Indictment — Breach of Indictment Rules — Two unrelated groups of counts in one indictment — Order for separate trials of each group — Whether proper — Whether indictment invalid — Whether proceedings after arraignment null — Whether venire de novo to be ordered — Indictments Act 1915, s 5(3) — Indictment Rules 1971, r 9
Blackstones Criminal Practice 2025
Responsibility for Drafting an Indictment - Ultimate Responsibility
D11.6
Responsibility for Drafting an Indictment - Mechanics of Drafting Indictments D11.7
Joinder of Counts in an Indictment - Application of the Rule D11.64
Severance D11.76
Motion to Quash an Indictment - Use of Such Motions by the Prosecution D11.112
Autrefois Acquit and Autrefois Convict - Scope of the Pleas - Findings that Cannot Form Basis for Plea of Autrefois Acquit D12.26
To cancel your subscription, please click the Cancel subscription button below and we will process your request as soon as possible.
We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies