MacKinlay v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co

Subject Matter

REVENUE — Income tax — Expenses of trade or profession (Schedule D) — Partnership — Computation of profits — Removal expenses incurred by partners moving to work at another partnership office — Reimbursement by partnership — Whether expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for purposes of partnership's business — Whether deductible in computing taxable profits — Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1970, s 130(a)

[1986] 1 WLR 1468; TC Leaflet No 3062, Ch D

[1989] Ch 454; [1988] 2 WLR 1117; [1988] 2 All ER 1; (1989) 62 TC 704; TC Leaflet No 3130, CA

[1990] 2 AC 239; [1989] 3 WLR 1245; [1990] 3 WLR 1245; [1990] 1 All ER 45; TC Leaflet No 3205, HL(E)

Appellate History

MacKinlay v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co [1986] 1 WLR 1468; TC Leaflet No 3062, Ch D

Decision of Vinelott J reversed

MacKinlay v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co [1989] Ch 454; [1988] 2 WLR 1117; [1988] 2 All ER 1; (1989) 62 TC 704; TC Leaflet No 3130, CA

MacKinlay v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co [1989] Ch 454; [1988] 2 WLR 1117; [1988] 2 All ER 1; (1989) 62 TC 704; TC Leaflet No 3130, CA

Decision of the Court of Appeal reversed

MacKinlay v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co [1990] 2 AC 239; [1989] 3 WLR 1245; [1990] 3 WLR 1245; [1990] 1 All ER 45; TC Leaflet No 3205, HL(E)

Subscribe or Register to access the full case information page. Registered users can access three Law Reports, three case information pages and perform three Case Genie searches per month. If you already have an ICLR account please log in. For other queries or to request a free trial please contact ICLR.

MoJ users should log in here.

We use cookies on this website, you can read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. To use website as intended please Accept Cookies